منابع مشابه
How to Analyze Modeling Approach Comparison Criteria
One possible final goal of defining a set of criteria to define modeling approaches [1] is to help people, especially from industry, picking up the good approaches or artifacts according to their own purpose. The authors of the comparison criteria have managed to get several different assessments made by defenders of particular modeling approaches. From our point of view the experiment is matur...
متن کاملHow to Analyze Paired Comparison Data
Thurstone’s Law of Comparative Judgment provides a method to convert subjective paired comparisons into one-dimensional quality scores. Applications include judging quality of different image reconstructions, or different products, or different web search results, etc. This tutorial covers the popular Thurstone-Mosteller Case V model and the Bradley-Terry logistic variant. We describe three app...
متن کاملHow to Analyze Nanomaterials ?
Nanotechnology has a great influence on modern technology, just like the development of DNA profiling on biotechnology in the past 50 years. Because of applying knowledge and techniques from natural science, forensic science aims to identify, individualize and evaluate evidence. Evidence will then be used to reconstruct crime scenes, guide investigations and bring criminals to justice. Nanotech...
متن کاملHow to Analyze Data for Age Discrimination in Layoff Situations
HR managers are directly involved in downsizing a workforce, yet most are unfamiliar with the statistical computations plaintiffs refer to in discrimination cases against their organizations. Plaintiffs use these statistics and procedures to challenge the effect of personnel layoff decisions, either with individual or class-wide discrimination challenges. HR managers who understand how to group...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics)
سال: 1976
ISSN: 0385-5481,1880-4705
DOI: 10.2333/jbhmk.3.2_27